so you know the game right you tease me with money in June 2005 and Jan 28 2007 power of attorney was with tamron hall the contract ended July 07 2007 she has no power of attorney to use the software package that i Juan Louis Barboza own i reside at 4551 s Richmond Chicago IL 60632  i am taking fox 32 CBS 2 NBC 5 clear channel communication  if fox 32 wants a trial is the day i call for head lines at the new york times and Chicago tribune to protest that it will not be a fair trial or due process   TAMRON HALL CAN NO LONGER RECEIVE ANY MONEY OR ASK FOR HELP FROM THE PEOPLE WHO ARE SETTING HER UP TO FALL FOR FRAUD.   I WILL NOT LET ANYONE TORTURE ME AS A SEX OFFENDER AN CALL ME A RAPIST OR A CHILD MOLESTER USING MY RADIO ID AND PRIVATE PHONE NUMBER AND WEB SITE THAT I WILL INFORM A FEDERAL JUDGE OF FRAUD AND CONSPIRED TO SEAL THE FACT THAT CORPORATE AMERICA IS VIOLATING MY HUMAN RIGHTS AND INFRINGING ON MY LIFE STORY AND VIOLATING MY RIGHTS TO PRIVACY AND USING THE FAKE NAME KELLY WOLF AND NEAL WOLF ON APRIL 06 2007 I WAS PUT TO JAIL FOR CRIMINAL TRESPASSING AT FOX 32 FOR SIGNING AN APPLICATION AND WAS CALLED A STALKER BY TAMRON HALL SHE DIDN'T SHOW UP TO COURT BECAUSE IT WAS LIES SHE MADE FOR HER OLD EMPLOYER TO COVER UP FOR HER ACTIONS I WILL SUPPORT HER AT COURT AND PROVE IT AT COURT THAT I WAS FRAMED     Dirksen Federal Building. 219 S. Dearborn Street. Chicago, IL 60604 ... Dirksen Federal Building. 219 S. Dearborn Street. Chicago, IL 60604. or. 619 U.S. ...       The First Amendment to the United States Constitution is a part of the United States Bill of Rights. It prohibits the federal legislature from making laws "respecting an establishment of religion" (the "Establishment Clause") or that prohibit free exercise of religion (the "Free Exercise Clause"), laws that infringe the freedom of speech, infringe the freedom of the press, limit the right to assemble peaceably, or limit the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Although the First Amendment explicitly prohibits only the named rights from being abridged by laws made by Congress, the courts have interpreted it as applying more broadly. As the first sentence in the body of the Constitution reserves all law-making ("legislative") authority to Congress, the courts have held that the First Amendment's terms also extend to the executive and judicial branches. Additionally, in the 20th century the Supreme Court has held that the Due Process clause of the 1868 Fourteenth Amendment "incorporates" the limitations of the First Amendment to restrict also the states.   The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution (Amendment XIV) is one of the post-Civil War amendments (known as the Reconstruction Amendments), first intended to secure rights for former slaves. It includes the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses among others. It was proposed on June 13, 1866, and ratified on July 9, 1868.[1] It is perhaps the most significant structural change to the Constitution since the passage of the United States Bill of Rights. The amendment provides a broad definition of United States citizenship, overturning the Dred Scott case, which excluded African Americans. It requires the states to provide equal protection under the law to all persons (not only to citizens) within their jurisdictions, and was used in the mid-20th century to dismantle legal segregation, as in Brown v. Board of Education. Its Due Process Clause has driven much important and controversial case law regarding privacy rights, abortion (see Roe v. Wade), and other issues. The other two post-Civil War amendments are the Thirteenth Amendment (banning slavery) and the Fifteenth Amendment (banning race-based voting qualifications). According to Supreme Court Justice Noah Swayne, "Fairly construed, these amendments may be said to rise to the dignity of a new Magna Carta."[2]